As “research it yourself” becomes a rallying cry for promoters of outlandish conspiracy theories with real-world consequences, educators need to think hard about what’s missing from their information literacy efforts.
Please read this article in time for our April (moved from March) discussion. It can be found here.
This discussion is now open. See comments below.
If you want to know more about how to join in please check out my FAQ page or please just ask.
Oh Elizabeth, every time I read something there's another rabbit hole to loose myself in. That Year 6 project looks as though it might have potential for our Year 7s and I am beginning to think about whether there is potential for a transition/school intro. project that could be multi disciplinary.
I am afraid I might be missing something in my reading and your understanding of this article. I am struggling to find the conflict. I agree that no single academic should influence a philosophy but I certainly don't feel FOSIL is falling into that trap if that's what you mean. I may, however, have misunderstood.
Interestingly I didn't read this as being an approach at odds with teaching information literacy through inquiry. I felt that it was approaching some of the questions we considered last month, about how to teach source evaluation, and coming at those from a new angle. I agree Elizabeth, the idea that we teach students to think about 'how information works' (Pawley) felt like a positive suggestion but I didn't feel this was a limiting idea. I thought it was a different way of dealing with some of the problems that arise from the CRAAP type schemes that we discussed. This feels like taking a step back from the resource and looking at the information in context which surely is fundamental to good information literacy practice.
I also wanted to discuss the idea of 'Information Agency' and the democratisation of information. I think that we need to consider how we can teach students to distinguish between having access to a lot of information and having access to accurate/considered information, when this distinction is particularly important, and what the value is of an expert. In order to do this they (and I) really need to understand a lot more about the algorithms behind the systems that we use to find sources and also traditional methods of verifying information. I want to 'take a strong stand on behalf of ethical research practices, the voices of qualified experts, and the value of information systems that ... vet and value information.' (Barbara Fister) However, I am also aware that we are not only teaching students to apply these skills in the academic world but we need them to be able to evaluate real world information when they are using systems that are not applying rigorous vetting of expert opinions. If we do not make this distinction and teach students to do the same we are in danger of making our work irrelevant.
Linked to this was the statement (Project Information Literacy) that 'the majority of graduates felt that the research they were asked to do in college failed to prepare them to ask questions of their own' I think this is something that needs to be considered carefully and not brushed past. We need to be clear that not all searches for information are the same but that many of the rules can be applied across situations.
I do think these skills can be taught through inquiry, if fact it made me think of the opening of the Netflix documentary 'The Social Dilemma' where the programme makers point out the differences in predictive searches on Google - a real world demonstration of the issues Dawn is talking about.
This is a really interesting article and brings up, yet more, areas to consider.
“... lack of consistent instruction about information and media literacy across students’ educational experience, the diminishment of the humanities as a core element of general education, and the difficulty of keeping up with technological change and digital culture have all played a role...”
I have in the past felt that information literacy teaching is contextual based on the school and its curriculum. But the discussion in this article strongly argues that there should be more consistency in information and media literacy instruction. Just in the past year the information landscape has transformed beyond recognition. Personally, I have to admit, that it is very difficult to keep abreast of. The dissemination and control of information is so flipping complex. It makes my head ache thinking about it! I feel, most definitely, the time has come for a consistent framework in which to teach information and digital literacy skills. Totally agree! But I do not honestly know what this framework will look like. I only have a very basic overview knowledge of FOSIL, but perhaps this could be one of many ways we could approach this problem.
There seems to be a real conflict between those who teach information literacy through inquiry and those who want to teach it as a specific tool. What interests me about this article is there is a lot of similarities and although it is talking about the importance of information literacy it has branched out far beyond the find, evaluate and use quality information of the past. Many schools already use inquiry as a way to teach content so school librarians supporting the curriculum this way seems to be the perfect opportunity to teach information literacy. As the number of school librarians dwindles I wonder if we would be better placed to work together to find a common ground through information literacy rather than be at odds with each other.
What did you think about this article. Is there more for us to do? What are your biggest takeaways?